Large-scale demonstration data
Collection protocols, teleoperation rigs, and quality metrics for demonstration datasets that stay useful past the paper deadline.
Benchmarks go stale, demonstrations don't transfer, and every lab rebuilds the same pipeline. We work on the layer underneath: the datasets, evaluation, and tooling that make robot learning reproducible.
Robot learning keeps rediscovering that the bottleneck is data, not architecture. These are the pieces we think are worth building in the open.
Collection protocols, teleoperation rigs, and quality metrics for demonstration datasets that stay useful past the paper deadline.
Measuring what actually survives the reality gap, and building simulators whose failures predict real hardware failures.
Standing evaluation suites with real robots in the loop, so a number on a leaderboard means something on a table.
Policy architectures for contact-rich manipulation, studied through the lens of what data they need rather than what they score.
Dataset formats, loaders, and replay infrastructure. Boring software that everyone needs and nobody wants to maintain alone.
A result you cannot rerun is a press release. Every paper we publish comes with the dataset, the loader, and the evaluation script that produced the number.
Built for the boring parts: consistent schemas, honest failure cases, and enough metadata to know what you are training on.
Contact-rich tabletop manipulation across 12 embodiments, with synchronized wrist and third-person video.
Indoor navigation trajectories collected in occupied buildings, including the failure cases most datasets filter out.
A standing evaluation suite with hardware in the loop. Submit a policy, get a real-robot score.
We collaborate with labs and teams collecting robot data in the wild. If you have a platform, a dataset, or a benchmark you want to open up, we would like to hear about it.